.
Feedback

Wallingford Board of Education Approves 3.56% Spending Increase

The Town Council still needs to vote on whether to approve or alter a proposed $92.7 million to the school district for the 2013-14 year before any funding increase is enacted.

The Wallingford Board of Education voted Monday evening to back a 3.56 percent increase in the upcoming school year’s budget.

According to The Record-Journal, the vote was 7-1 to approve a $92.7 million package which includes $3.1 million in increases for the 2013-14 fiscal year.

The budget still needs the Town Council to approve it, although the council very well may shave some spending in certain areas.

Superintendent Salvatore Menzo told Patch that roughly half of the proposed spending increase — $1.5 million — is attributed to a series of state and federal unfunded mandates.

The mandates are coming from Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s education reforms enacted last year — which call for stronger teacher evaluations — as well as a set of initiatives put forth in a national set of Common Core Standards.

Most of the actual spending from these mandates would go toward professional development, curriculum writing for teachers, and instructional resources, like computer programs or other materials, Menzo said. None of the unfunded mandates call for more staff.

The rest of the proposed funding hike, roughly $1.6 million, would cover other general year-over-year expenditures in the Wallingford education system, Menzo said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Wallingford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:40 pm
And I don't suppose the low rate of male participation in the labor market (a bit of info I missedRead More somehow) has anything to do with a RISE in female participation? You aren't suggesting that women just stay home and out of the jobs that somehow "belong" to men, are you?
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:35 pm
Touchy, touchy! All I asked was how MAC compared the two apparent misstatements. My guess was thatRead More the obvious disrespect that was shown by the way he refers to the President was a hint that he was a biased commentator. His defenders have called me a lib, but most folks who know me wouldn't call me that at all. I was hoping for some "fair and balanced" discussion here, but the name-callers have arrived. I ask MAC to provided some reference to support his latest pronouncement that the President "wants to destroy our economy." There are a lot of commentators who would disagree with your assessment of the economy anyway, but when did the President say he "wants to destroy our economy?"
MAC May 13, 2013 at 12:00 pm
We now have a president who wants to destroy our economy and most all of what made America theRead More (formerly?) greatest and most FREE nation in the world! He has done a fair job of accomplishing that destruction, has he not? The male labor participation rate is now the lowest since WWII, and energy costs have "necessarily skyrocketed" as he demanded!! Then we have "Common Core" and the like for the nation's schools, under which the regime denies the Constitution and instead teaches "social justice" and that America is responsible for the poverty in other nations!