.
Feedback

Wallingford Schools Could Lose $105,000 in Grant Funding If Sequester Goes Through

Superintendent Salvatore Menzo said the federal funding cuts, which pay for expenses like special education instruction and supplies, are possible come Friday, but also that officials should be cautious and not overact until the situation is definite.

Wallingford school stand to lose approximately $105,000 in federal funding if Congress goes through with the $85 billion sequestration — a series of automatic spending cuts that would affect the whole country — on Friday, March 1.

Those funding cuts come in the form of four separate federal grants allocated to the Wallingford school district for expenses related to special education, supplies and other school expenditures, said Superintendent Salvatore Menzo.

The superintendent said that, while the figures are estimates at this time, they were calculated based on analyses by American Association of Superintendents, a national organization that has been monitoring the impact of the sequester.

According to Menzo, here’s the breakdown on what Wallingford would lose under the federal sequester:

  • $70,000 in Disabilities Education Assistance grant funding (DEA) — Used toward special education expenses.
  • $25,000 in Title I grant funding — Used toward expenses such as reading and numeracy development.
  • $7,000 in Title II grant funding — Used toward professional development in the area of curriculum instruction and best practices for students.
  • $3,000 in Career Technical Education grant funding — Used toward resources in the classroom, like professional development.

“I think we have to take it one step at a time,” Menzo said, when asked if Wallingford was taking any steps to prepare for this potential funding cut.

While noting that these cuts very likely will come down, Menzo said the town still needs to wait if any information changes come Friday. If the cuts do go through, then Wallingford may just have to look into its current operating budget and make reductions where needed to offset the funding loss.  

“Everybody (referring school superintendents) is trying to avoid an overreaction because that could only cause unnecessary concern,” Menzo said, adding that school officials in Connecticut are keeping a close watch on any information coming down about the sequester.

As far as the town side of things, Mayor William Dickinson Jr. said he assumed Wallingford would be affected, although it would be indirectly.

“Funds that we may receive for various grants or other programs would very well be in support by federal funding,” Dickinson said. “But I’m not aware of anything directly that would impact us.”

He noted that the town doesn’t participate in any specific federal programs.

“If it’s a relatively small amount of money against our budget then it will not have a huge impact,” Dickinson said. “It’ll probably be absorbed within the budget year.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Wallingford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:40 pm
And I don't suppose the low rate of male participation in the labor market (a bit of info I missedRead More somehow) has anything to do with a RISE in female participation? You aren't suggesting that women just stay home and out of the jobs that somehow "belong" to men, are you?
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:35 pm
Touchy, touchy! All I asked was how MAC compared the two apparent misstatements. My guess was thatRead More the obvious disrespect that was shown by the way he refers to the President was a hint that he was a biased commentator. His defenders have called me a lib, but most folks who know me wouldn't call me that at all. I was hoping for some "fair and balanced" discussion here, but the name-callers have arrived. I ask MAC to provided some reference to support his latest pronouncement that the President "wants to destroy our economy." There are a lot of commentators who would disagree with your assessment of the economy anyway, but when did the President say he "wants to destroy our economy?"
MAC May 13, 2013 at 12:00 pm
We now have a president who wants to destroy our economy and most all of what made America theRead More (formerly?) greatest and most FREE nation in the world! He has done a fair job of accomplishing that destruction, has he not? The male labor participation rate is now the lowest since WWII, and energy costs have "necessarily skyrocketed" as he demanded!! Then we have "Common Core" and the like for the nation's schools, under which the regime denies the Constitution and instead teaches "social justice" and that America is responsible for the poverty in other nations!