.
Feedback

Connecticut Can Tax Scholastic Book Club Sales

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision not to take up the case is a $3.2 million victory for the state and its coffers.

 

Scholastic Book Clubs, which for decades sold books to school children in classrooms across Connecticut, must pay the state $3.2 million in uncollected sales taxes on those sales.

That’s the upshot of the U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal this week to hear an appeal challenging a state court ruling that the book sales are taxable and that Scholastic Book Clubs owes sales taxes dating back to 2005.

The state had argued in the case that although it is based in Missouri, Scholastic Book Clubs is liable for in-state taxes because it uses Connecticut teachers as its local sales representatives. There are some 14,000 school teachers in Connecticut who sell books through Scholastic, the state argued.

Being exempt from sales taxes, the state had maintained, was also unfair to Connecticut retailers.

“This decision levels the playing field for Connecticut-based retailers who rightly collect and remit the sales tax,” said Kevin Sullivan, the commissioner of the Department of Revenue Services.

The case has broader implications for the state’s efforts to tax online sales and other goods ordered from companies based out of state, according to a Hartford Courant columnist.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Wallingford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:40 pm
And I don't suppose the low rate of male participation in the labor market (a bit of info I missedRead More somehow) has anything to do with a RISE in female participation? You aren't suggesting that women just stay home and out of the jobs that somehow "belong" to men, are you?
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:35 pm
Touchy, touchy! All I asked was how MAC compared the two apparent misstatements. My guess was thatRead More the obvious disrespect that was shown by the way he refers to the President was a hint that he was a biased commentator. His defenders have called me a lib, but most folks who know me wouldn't call me that at all. I was hoping for some "fair and balanced" discussion here, but the name-callers have arrived. I ask MAC to provided some reference to support his latest pronouncement that the President "wants to destroy our economy." There are a lot of commentators who would disagree with your assessment of the economy anyway, but when did the President say he "wants to destroy our economy?"
MAC May 13, 2013 at 12:00 pm
We now have a president who wants to destroy our economy and most all of what made America theRead More (formerly?) greatest and most FREE nation in the world! He has done a fair job of accomplishing that destruction, has he not? The male labor participation rate is now the lowest since WWII, and energy costs have "necessarily skyrocketed" as he demanded!! Then we have "Common Core" and the like for the nation's schools, under which the regime denies the Constitution and instead teaches "social justice" and that America is responsible for the poverty in other nations!