.
Feedback

Wallingford Has Third-Highest Population of Gun Permit Holders in New Haven County

According to a database published by The New Haven Register, over 2,800 town residents, or 6.2 percent, have gun permits.

 

Only 6.2 percent of Wallingford’s 45,135 residents have pistol permits, an average number when taking into account that — in some Connecticut towns — as many as 12 percent of residents possess permits.

But when comparing the actual population of pistol permit holders with other towns in New Haven County, Wallingford comes in third, according to a new map database published by The New Haven Register.

The database shows that 2,812 of Wallingford’s residents have gun permits and only two other cities — Waterbury and Meriden — are higher.

Here’s the breakdown:

Town/City Rank Permit-Holding Population Percentage of Overall Population Total Population Waterbury 1 3,372 3.10% 110,366 Meriden 2 3,033 5% 60,868 Wallingford 3 2,812 6.20% 45,135

Percentage-wise, Oxford comes in first in New Haven County with 9.9 percent of its residents holding gun permits, followed by Prospect at 9.4 percent and Wolcott at 8.6 percent.

Click here to see the full database on the entire state.

To read The New Haven Register’s story on small towns having a higher percentage of gun permit holders, click here. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Wallingford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:40 pm
And I don't suppose the low rate of male participation in the labor market (a bit of info I missedRead More somehow) has anything to do with a RISE in female participation? You aren't suggesting that women just stay home and out of the jobs that somehow "belong" to men, are you?
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:35 pm
Touchy, touchy! All I asked was how MAC compared the two apparent misstatements. My guess was thatRead More the obvious disrespect that was shown by the way he refers to the President was a hint that he was a biased commentator. His defenders have called me a lib, but most folks who know me wouldn't call me that at all. I was hoping for some "fair and balanced" discussion here, but the name-callers have arrived. I ask MAC to provided some reference to support his latest pronouncement that the President "wants to destroy our economy." There are a lot of commentators who would disagree with your assessment of the economy anyway, but when did the President say he "wants to destroy our economy?"
MAC May 13, 2013 at 12:00 pm
We now have a president who wants to destroy our economy and most all of what made America theRead More (formerly?) greatest and most FREE nation in the world! He has done a fair job of accomplishing that destruction, has he not? The male labor participation rate is now the lowest since WWII, and energy costs have "necessarily skyrocketed" as he demanded!! Then we have "Common Core" and the like for the nation's schools, under which the regime denies the Constitution and instead teaches "social justice" and that America is responsible for the poverty in other nations!