.
Feedback

Connecticut Students Would Pay 5 Percent More to Attend State Universities

Education officials are set to vote on a plan today to hike tuition and fees at the four state universities, Eastern, Western, Central and Southern. The move would not increase UConn's tuition and fees.

 

In an effort to lure more out-of-state students to Connecticut and close a budget gap, the Board of Regents for Higher Education, which oversees the state's university system, is considering a plan to hike in-state tuition rates by 5.1 percent for the fall 2013-2014 academic year and decrease tuition for out of state students by 2.6 percent.

The Regents' finance committee meets today to act on the proposal, according to the Connecticut Mirror.

The move would mean in-state students living on campus would pay an additional $778 in tuition and fees next year, while out-of-state students living on campus pay $170 less, the website reports. In-state students living off campus would see thier tuition and fees increase by $434 a year.        

The Board of Regents oversees the state's four universities, Western, Eastern, Southern and Central. They do not set fees or tuition for the University of Connecticut.

The new tuition and fees, the Mirror reports, reflect an effort by the Board of Regents to attract more out of state students at the four universities and balance its budget amid increasing cuts by state officials.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Wallingford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:40 pm
And I don't suppose the low rate of male participation in the labor market (a bit of info I missedRead More somehow) has anything to do with a RISE in female participation? You aren't suggesting that women just stay home and out of the jobs that somehow "belong" to men, are you?
Final Judgment May 13, 2013 at 01:35 pm
Touchy, touchy! All I asked was how MAC compared the two apparent misstatements. My guess was thatRead More the obvious disrespect that was shown by the way he refers to the President was a hint that he was a biased commentator. His defenders have called me a lib, but most folks who know me wouldn't call me that at all. I was hoping for some "fair and balanced" discussion here, but the name-callers have arrived. I ask MAC to provided some reference to support his latest pronouncement that the President "wants to destroy our economy." There are a lot of commentators who would disagree with your assessment of the economy anyway, but when did the President say he "wants to destroy our economy?"
MAC May 13, 2013 at 12:00 pm
We now have a president who wants to destroy our economy and most all of what made America theRead More (formerly?) greatest and most FREE nation in the world! He has done a fair job of accomplishing that destruction, has he not? The male labor participation rate is now the lowest since WWII, and energy costs have "necessarily skyrocketed" as he demanded!! Then we have "Common Core" and the like for the nation's schools, under which the regime denies the Constitution and instead teaches "social justice" and that America is responsible for the poverty in other nations!